What can The Young Ones teach us about Thatcherism? part one

This is the beginning of a work-in-progress piece I have been devising on The Young Ones and Thatcherism. I thought I would post it as the clip is great and rather topical. If you can think of any particular bits in the series that have historical relevance for understanding Thatcherite Britain, please comment below.

In one of my history topics that I used to team-teach in, I presented a lecture of Thatcherism and Britain in the 1980s. In this lecture, I showed my students a clip from the episode ‘Cash’ from the UK television comedy show The Young Ones. The scene portrays one of the characters pretending to have a baby in a non-furnished house. In the panic of the impending ‘baby’ (the character, Vyvyan, is actually male), another character, Rik (the typical student-lefty stereotype), yells:

We can’t, we haven’t got any money. Vyvyan’s baby will be a pauper. Oliver Twist, Geoffrey Dickens. Back to Victorian values. I hope you’re satisfied, Thatcher![1]

As well as the delightful pun of mixing the author Charles Dickens with the Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens, this exclamation by Rik echoes a theme that emerged around the time of 1983 General Election, when Margaret Thatcher used the phrase ‘Victorian values’ to describe her political outlook:

The other day I appeared on a certain television programme. And I was asked whether I was trying restore ‘Victorian values’. I said straight out, yes I was. And I am… I believe that honesty and thrift and reliability and hard work and a sense of responsibility for your fellow men are not simply Victorian values. They do not get out of date.[2]

Using this clip is not just for entertainment purposes or an excuse to show some audio-visual material to wake up first year students who may have been asleep. I would argue that watching The Young Ones has a definite pedagogical benefit for students. Most of the students in the class would not have seen the television show before and for them, it is history. The Young Ones touches on many of the historical themes that I raised in my lectures on Thatcherism and British society in the 1980s and does so in a very engaging manner.

However this does not mean that The Young Ones is an accurate reflection of the times per se – the show is obviously an over-the-top and surreal portrayal of student life in Thatcherite Britain. We, as historians and students of history, don’t watch The Young Ones to observe an authentic depiction of life under Thatcherism as it actually was, but because we can see certain themes and concepts (important for understanding Thatcherism and 1980s Britain) depicted in the television show. I would argue that a whole history topic or a weighty tome could be dedicated to the historical themes portrayed in The Young Ones. It is a ‘simulacrum’ of Thatcherite Britain, but we watch it in acknowledgement as a simulacrum, rather than as a trustworthy first-hand account of the times. The show works as an excellent demonstration of the zeitgeist of Britain under Margaret Thatcher, but at the same time, it is factually inaccurate and stakes no claim to historical authenticity. In future parts to this work, I hope to uncover some of the key themes of the Thatcherite zeitgeist and highlight how scenes from The Young Ones can reflect on how we understand more traditional historical concepts of Thatcherism and Britain in the 1980s, such as unemployment, the left, police harassment, the threat of nuclear war, racism, women’s rights, apartheid and the ‘generation gap’.

As I mentioned above, any suggestions for key scenes from the show and how they illuminate our historical understanding of Thatcherism would be greatly appreciated. Otherwise, enjoy the clip.

Boomshanka, Evan.

 

 


[1] ‘Cash’, episode 8, The Young Ones, 1984

[2] Margaret Thatcher, Speech to Glasgow Chamber of Commerce, 28 January, 1983, Margaret Thatcher Foundation, http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/105244

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. I am not sure if this helps but Nozin’ Aroun’ ft. Ben Elton is one of the paradigmatic pisstakes of the ‘youth’ implicated not only in phony ‘youth culture’ that perhaps starts to get quarantined in a particular kind of way in the Thatcher years (not that I really know anything about that) but in ‘youth work’ imho. Youth work as a kind of substrate of social work (but with more grassroots connections to church groups and hippies) came out of the seventies and has been the butt of jokes about dork adults trying to relate to yoof ever since. South Park, Father Ted, Ali G, have all helped to continue this magnificent tradition of lulz which also poses young people as knowing and unknowable subjects (OF FASCISTS!). At the same time youth work attempted to appreciate young people as individuals outside of the family and involved a critique of the nuclear family as a necessarily safe or nurturing place for a Yoof; not to mention the kinds of pressures it becomes subject to when turned into a particular economic unit under Thatcher. Perhaps TYO has some articulation with Loach’s critiques of social work in this sense.
    I am only half joking.
    “YOUNG ADULTS!”

  2. Other main subject is about BBC freedom from government. This is not usual on the Public policies applied to Television and Media in European countries to give such chance to be critical with government. This is the most brilliant time in British public television, which was taken as a model throughout Europe. National Catalan TV started in 1984 playing that historical BBC serials like “Black adder”, “Young Ones”, and other great serials. Also it is related to the canon revenue model that gives incomes and freedom to BBC because it is straight paid by UK citizens (not by indirect taxes)

  3. Good point Ana. I think that the ‘Street Level’ section on Nozin’ Around also demonstrates and satirises the moral panic that many had about wayward youth in the 1970s and 1980s, especially the last guy who says, ‘A lot of people say that young adults are violent right, but how would you feel if you could have intercourse with a partner of your choice, yet you could not drink in pubs?’ It’s a great mocking of the attitudes towards youth by the mainstream (particularly after the 1981 riots), but also gives a very surreal excuse for youth unrest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s